| | Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? | |
| | Author | Message |
---|
happy jack
Posts : 6988
| Subject: Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? 2/7/2009, 4:51 pm | |
| It’s certainly a good thing that there is no pro-Obama media bias, because otherwise an article such as this might be construed as a fawning piece of bilge, written by an idiot, and directed at an audience full of idiots who would gladly sit there with their mouths agape and their heads nodding in agreement as they read it. (Caution: Do not read with a full stomach.)http://warner.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/05/sometimes-a-president-is-just-a-president/ | |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? 2/7/2009, 10:57 pm | |
| The Obama's have been marketed well, dat's fer sure. I'm surprised with all the items his image has been placed and sold on hasn't boosted the economy more.... |
| | | happy jack
Posts : 6988
| Subject: Re: Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? 2/16/2009, 5:06 pm | |
| | |
| | | Artie60438
Posts : 9728
| Subject: Re: Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? 2/16/2009, 5:31 pm | |
| | |
| | | happy jack
Posts : 6988
| Subject: Re: Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? 2/16/2009, 6:04 pm | |
| | |
| | | Artie60438
Posts : 9728
| Subject: Re: Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? 2/17/2009, 7:26 am | |
| - happy jack wrote:
- Artie60438 wrote:
- You might want to let people know that it's a parody from "The Onion".
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/nations_blacks_creeped_out_by_all I'm frankly not surprised that it took a web search for you to figure that out. As far as other people, I kind of assumed that they'd figure it out on their own. I knew immediately it was from the Onion. I only got the link in order to warn others | |
| | | happy jack
Posts : 6988
| Subject: Re: Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? 2/17/2009, 8:19 am | |
| - Artie60438 wrote:
- happy jack wrote:
- Artie60438 wrote:
- You might want to let people know that it's a parody from "The Onion".
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/nations_blacks_creeped_out_by_all I'm frankly not surprised that it took a web search for you to figure that out. As far as other people, I kind of assumed that they'd figure it out on their own. I knew immediately it was from the Onion. I only got the link in order to warn others Of course you did, Artie, of course you did. You are a regular Paul-freakin'-Revere, aren't you? "One if by land, two if from the Onion." | |
| | | Artie60438
Posts : 9728
| Subject: Re: Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? 2/17/2009, 9:14 am | |
| - happy jack wrote:
- Artie60438 wrote:
- happy jack wrote:
- Artie60438 wrote:
- You might want to let people know that it's a parody from "The Onion".
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/nations_blacks_creeped_out_by_all I'm frankly not surprised that it took a web search for you to figure that out. As far as other people, I kind of assumed that they'd figure it out on their own. I knew immediately it was from the Onion. I only got the link in order to warn others Of course you did, Artie, of course you did. You are a regular Paul-freakin'-Revere, aren't you? "One if by land, two if from the Onion." You post a parody as if it was a news article without a link. I point it out,and I'm somehow the bad guy? | |
| | | happy jack
Posts : 6988
| | | | Artie60438
Posts : 9728
| Subject: Re: Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? 2/17/2009, 9:46 am | |
| Food for thought.....If you had done the right thing and posted it with a link we wouldn't even be having this exchange. | |
| | | happy jack
Posts : 6988
| Subject: Re: Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? 2/17/2009, 3:16 pm | |
| - Artie60438 wrote:
- Food for thought.....If you had done the right thing and posted it with a link we wouldn't even be having this exchange.
Au contraire - if you hadn't been gullible enough to believe that it was a legitimate article, we wouldn't be having this exchange. | |
| | | edge540
Posts : 1165
| Subject: Re: Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? 2/17/2009, 4:39 pm | |
| jack, you're SO transparent.
You know that the reason you left the link out was so that you could nail one the libs here for being gullible.
Gee, it's a shame it didn't work.
Artie called you on it & now your pathetic attempts at trying to mock Arnie are so lame, you should really be ashamed. | |
| | | happy jack
Posts : 6988
| Subject: Re: Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? 2/17/2009, 4:49 pm | |
| - edge540 wrote:
- jack, you're SO transparent.
You know that the reason you left the link out was so that you could nail one the libs here for being gullible.
Gee, it's a shame it didn't work.
Artie called you on it & now your pathetic attempts at trying to mock Arnie are so lame, you should really be ashamed. edge: Let me explain something to you - exposing a liberal as being gullible is like fishing with dynamite. There is no sport to it, no challenge, and I have better things to do. Liberals do a fine job of making asses of themselves without my help. | |
| | | edge540
Posts : 1165
| Subject: Re: Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? 2/18/2009, 10:32 am | |
| Yeah right. So jack, did you enjoy Frank Rich last Sunday? The subject is: Republicans "making asses of themselves." | |
| | | Scorpion
Posts : 2141
| Subject: Re: Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? 2/18/2009, 3:52 pm | |
| - Artie60438 wrote:
- You might want to let people know that it's a parody from "The Onion".
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/nations_blacks_creeped_out_by_all Yeah, well as I pointed out to Jack back on another site, at another time, the Onion has a very restrictive policy regarding the use of its material... http://www.theonion.com/content/privacy - Quote :
- The content of this web-site—graphics, text and other elements—is Copyright 2009 by Onion, Inc., and may not be reprinted or retransmitted in whole or in part without the expressed written consent of the publisher.
I understand that Jack thought it was funny, but that doesn't give him or anybody else the right to steal copyrighted material from another website. There is nothing in their policy that permits reposting for any purpose, commercial or otherwise. Copyright holders have an absolute right to place restrictions on how their stuff is used, and we should all respect that. | |
| | | happy jack
Posts : 6988
| Subject: Re: Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? 2/18/2009, 5:41 pm | |
| I'll tell you what, Scorpion - you don't turn me in to the Onion police, and I won't nark you out to sfgate. Deal? - Scorpion wrote:
- ... then perhaps a simple cartoon will help you to begin to understand...
Government Pork by Mark Fiore http://www.sfgate.com/pages/termsandconditions/… you may not download, post, display, publish, copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, modify, perform, broadcast, transfer, create derivative works from, sell or otherwise exploit any content, code, data or materials on or available through the Web Site. | |
| | | Scorpion
Posts : 2141
| Subject: Re: Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? 2/18/2009, 5:53 pm | |
| - happy jack wrote:
- I'll tell you what, Scorpion - you don't turn me in to the Onion police, and I won't nark you out to sfgate.
Deal?
- Scorpion wrote:
- ... then perhaps a simple cartoon will help you to begin to understand...
Government Pork by Mark Fiore http://www.sfgate.com/pages/termsandconditions/ … you may not download, post, display, publish, copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, modify, perform, broadcast, transfer, create derivative works from, sell or otherwise exploit any content, code, data or materials on or available through the Web Site. I didn't do any of those things, I put up a frickin' link. Are you honestly saying that you can't differentiate between the posting of copyrighted content, without attribution no less, and posting a link to a website where the content resides? C'mon Jack, I thought you were smarter than that, but perhaps I've given you too much credit. If you had any copyrighted material of your own , then I don't think that we'd need to have this conversation. | |
| | | happy jack
Posts : 6988
| Subject: Re: Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? 2/18/2009, 6:19 pm | |
| - Scorpion wrote:
- happy jack wrote:
- I'll tell you what, Scorpion - you don't turn me in to the Onion police, and I won't nark you out to sfgate.
Deal?
- Scorpion wrote:
- ... then perhaps a simple cartoon will help you to begin to understand...
Government Pork by Mark Fiore http://www.sfgate.com/pages/termsandconditions/ … you may not download, post, display, publish, copy, reproduce, distribute, transmit, modify, perform, broadcast, transfer, create derivative works from, sell or otherwise exploit any content, code, data or materials on or available through the Web Site. I didn't do any of those things, I put up a frickin' link. Are you honestly saying that you can't differentiate between the posting of copyrighted content, without attribution no less, and posting a link to a website where the content resides? C'mon Jack, I thought you were smarter than that, but perhaps I've given you too much credit.
If you had any copyrighted material of your own , then I don't think that we'd need to have this conversation. I thought I would lighten things up a bit. I thought wrong. | |
| | | Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? | |
| |
| | | | Pro-Obama bias? What pro-Obama bias? | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |