Tea Party Rep. Joe Walsh R-IL sued for $100,000 in child support

Tea Party Rep. Joe Walsh R-IL sued for $100,000 in child support

Quote :

Freshman U.S. Rep. Joe Walsh, a tax-bashing Tea Party champion who sharply lectures President Barack Obama and other Democrats on fiscal responsibility, owes more than $100,000 in child support to his ex-wife and three children, according to documents his ex-wife filed in their divorce case in December.

“I won’t place one more dollar of debt upon the backs of my kids and grandkids unless we structurally reform the way this town spends money!” Walsh says directly into the camera in his viral video lecturing Obama on the need to get the nation’s finances in order.

Walsh starts the video by saying, “President Obama, quit lying. Have you no shame, sir? In three short years, you’ve bankrupted this country.”

Recently this kook has been all over cable TV and just about anywhere a microphone is present yapping about his concern on the debt ceiling. If you read the whole article you'll see what an overall deadbeat this guy is.
The sad part is that Tea Party clowns like him that can't even manage their own finances are holding the country hostage on the debt ceiling.

I think that John Boehner,Eric Cantor along with many other Republicans in the House and Senate can be compared to dead beat dads. Over the years, their votes on tax cuts, wars and tax subsidies gave birth to the debt problem the US is facing.IMO, refusing to pay for the the debt they created isn't much different than being a deadbeat dad.

The bizarro world of wingnut family values....

Quote :

Rep. Joe Walsh wins 'pro-family' award; still hasn't paid $100K in child support
When you think pro-family, who do you think of? Why, if you're the ultra-conservative Family Research Council, you think of notorious child-support deadbeat Rep. Joe Walsh:

Republican Rep. Joe Walsh was the only Illinois congressman to be named a “True Blue” member of Congress for “unwavering support of the family” by the Family Research Council Action committee Thursday. [...]

Quote :

“We thank Cong. Walsh who has voted consistently to defend faith, family and freedom,” said FRCA President Tony Perkins. “Cong. Walsh and other ‘True Blue Members’ have voted to repeal Obamacare, de-fund Planned Parenthood, end government funding for abortion within the health care law, uphold the Defense of Marriage Act, and continue support for school choice. I applaud their commitment to uphold the institutions of marriage and family.”

If he's such a proponent of marriage and family, why does he had an ex-wife?

KarenT wrote:

If he's such a proponent of marriage and family, why does he had an ex-wife?

That's par for the course with these guys. 2 of their candidates for POTUS are Caine,a serial sex harasser,and Gingrich,a serial adulterer.

happy jack wrote:

Artie60438 wrote:

KarenT wrote:

If he's such a proponent of marriage and family, why does he had an ex-wife?

That's par for the course with these guys. 2 of their candidates for POTUS are Caine,a serial sex harasser,and Gingrich,a serial adulterer.

[b]Ah, yes.
Two qualities that the Democrats managed to efficiently combine in one POTUS - B. J. Clinton.

News Flash Clinton no longer in office nor running for anything! So now according to your logic neither Caine or Gingrich should be running,yes?

Back to the topic:What's your opinion of Deadbeat Walsh?

happy jack wrote:

If what you are trying to say is that someone who possesses those qualities cannot be elected president, you’ve already been proven to be dreadfully wrong.[/b]

Don't try and twist my words. What I'm asking is if you're OK with Caine and Ginrich's actions.\

Oh,and you forget this...Back to the topic:What's your opinion of Deadbeat Walsh?

Here is the real kicker:

Quote :

Rep. Joe Walsh is over his recent 100% rating on pro-family issues given by the Family Research Council Action committee.
Walsh received a rare 100% rating on his congressional voting record on pro-family issues and was one of the few to rate so high on FRC’s "Vote Scorecard." The rating earned him the status of "True Blue Member".

http://www.chicagonow.com/publius-forum/2011/11/walsh-unfairly-slammed-over-pro-family-group-praise/

happy jack wrote:

Artie60438 wrote:

Better yet Chuck,Challenge any one of those hypocrite trolls on the BLT board to search there for the term 60438
You'll see a nice 3 page wrap-up of that imbecile's former screen names that got him banned. Then watch them scatter like the hypocrites they are.

[b]I did the search, as you recommended, and all I found was three pages of posts, most of them from people who don't like you.
At all.
Not exactly a surprise, considering.

Wow! You're not even smart enough to figure out that they're the same psychopathic imbecile?

Artie60438 wrote:

happy jack wrote:

Artie60438 wrote:

Better yet Chuck,Challenge any one of those hypocrite trolls on the BLT board to search there for the term 60438
You'll see a nice 3 page wrap-up of that imbecile's former screen names that got him banned. Then watch them scatter like the hypocrites they are.

[b]I did the search, as you recommended, and all I found was three pages of posts, most of them from people who don't like you.
At all.
Not exactly a surprise, considering.

Wow! You're not even smart enough to figure out that they're the same psychopathic imbecile?

It's not a matter of being "not even smart enough to figure out".
It's a matter of being too disinterested to even care.

happy jack wrote:

Artie60438 wrote:

happy jack wrote:

[b]I did the search, as you recommended, and all I found was three pages of posts, most of them from people who don't like you.
At all.
Not exactly a surprise, considering.

Wow! You're not even smart enough to figure out that they're the same psychopathic imbecile?

It's not a matter of being "not even smart enough to figure out".
It's a matter of being too disinterested to even care.

Too disinterested? Yet you did the search as I suggested.
Your hypocrisy is amazing. You never get tired of embarrassing yourself,do you?

happy jack wrote:

Artie60438 wrote:

happy jack wrote:

Artie60438 wrote:

Better yet Chuck,Challenge any one of those hypocrite trolls on the BLT board to search there for the term 60438
You'll see a nice 3 page wrap-up of that imbecile's former screen names that got him banned. Then watch them scatter like the hypocrites they are.

[b]I did the search, as you recommended, and all I found was three pages of posts, most of them from people who don't like you.
At all.
Not exactly a surprise, considering.

Wow! You're not even smart enough to figure out that they're the same psychopathic imbecile?

It's not a matter of being "not even smart enough to figure out".
It's a matter of being too disinterested to even care.

If you don't care then why do you continue to bore the rest of us with this irrelevant bullshit? Why don't the two of you take your petty feud to the Lounge or something?

happy jack wrote:

Artie60438 wrote:

Too disinterested? Yet you did the search as I suggested.

I never did the search.

Wow! You can't even remember what you posted less than 24 hrs. Amazing
Maybe this will refresh your memory....

happy jack wrote:

Artie60438 wrote:

[b]Better yet Chuck,Challenge any one of those hypocrite trolls on the BLT board to search there for the term 60438
You'll see a nice 3 page wrap-up of that imbecile's former screen names that got him banned. Then watch them scatter like the hypocrites they are.

I did the search, as you recommended, and all I found was three pages of posts, most of them from people who don't like you.

As I said previously...

Artie60438 wrote:

Your hypocrisy is amazing. You never get tired of embarrassing yourself,do you?

Again, Please keep this crap off the National Forum. Thanks!

Scorpion wrote:

Again, Please keep this crap off the National Forum. Thanks!

Scorpion,I didn't start it,and I tried to get back on topic. Jack's obsessive issue has been beaten to death,yet he still keeps recycling it over and over.

Jack and Artie - please continue your lovers' quarrel privately.