Let Freedom Reign!


 
HomeHome  PublicationsPublications  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log in  

Share | 
 

 Republicans War on Women

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 10 ... 18  Next
AuthorMessage
Heretic

avatar

Posts : 3100

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   2/16/2012, 8:52 am

Back to top Go down
happy jack

avatar

Posts : 5986

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   2/16/2012, 5:03 pm

Heretic wrote:
The immediate victim suffers the physical harm, yes, to serve as a warning others, which is a very real act of intimidation (it is an actual crime, btw) in addition to the physical violence ....

If, as you say, separate categories of crime were committed, and they were committed against separate victims, then the perpetrator should be tried on separate counts – once for the actual physical violence against the actual, tangible victim, and second, for the crimes of intimidation against the other so-called victims, with the burden of proof on the prosecution to produce these victims, and to establish that they too were harmed.
Back to top Go down
Heretic

avatar

Posts : 3100

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   2/17/2012, 8:55 am

Quote :
If, as you say, separate categories of crime were committed, and they were committed against separate victims, then the perpetrator should be tried on separate counts – once for the actual physical violence against the actual, tangible victim, and second, for the crimes of intimidation against the other so-called victims, with the burden of proof on the prosecution to produce these victims, and to establish that they too were harmed.

Which would render terrorism nonexistent, since at worst it would only ever be murder manslaughter, rather than an act of violence used in an attempt to intimidate and terrorize a population into changing political policy.
Back to top Go down
Heretic

avatar

Posts : 3100

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   2/17/2012, 9:02 am

Back to top Go down
Artie60438

avatar

Posts : 9366

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   2/27/2012, 3:02 pm

Back to top Go down
happy jack

avatar

Posts : 5986

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   2/27/2012, 8:18 pm

Artie60438 wrote:


Whose method of preventing female orgasms do you prefer?
The non-existent cartoon Catholics portrayed in your comic strip, or the real-life Islamists portrayed in the link below?



http://islammonitor.org/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=1460
Back to top Go down
Artie60438

avatar

Posts : 9366

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   2/27/2012, 8:36 pm

happy jack wrote:
Artie60438 wrote:


[b]Whose method of preventing female orgasms do you prefer?
The non-existent cartoon Catholics portrayed in your comic strip, or the real-life Islamists portrayed in the link below?
Non-existent? Perhaps you would like to share with us the official position of the Catholic church regarding contraception while you try to remove your foot from your mouth.
Back to top Go down
happy jack

avatar

Posts : 5986

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   2/27/2012, 8:52 pm

Artie60438 wrote:
happy jack wrote:
Artie60438 wrote:


Whose method of preventing female orgasms do you prefer?
The non-existent cartoon Catholics portrayed in your comic strip, or the real-life Islamists portrayed in the link below?
Non-existent? Perhaps you would like to share with us the official position of the Catholic church regarding contraception while you try to remove your foot from your mouth.
I'm aware of the official position of the Catholic church on contraception, and I've stated numerous times that I don't agree with it.
I am also aware that characters in a comic strip are non-existent people.
So, regarding my question:
Myself, I am very, very pro-female orgasm.
You, I'm not so sure.
But, just for the sake of argument, whose method of preventing female orgasms is preferable in the real world?
Catholic or Muslim?
I'll take door #1, Monty.
How about you?
Back to top Go down
Artie60438

avatar

Posts : 9366

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   2/28/2012, 7:23 am

happy jack wrote:
Artie60438 wrote:
happy jack wrote:
Artie60438 wrote:


Whose method of preventing female orgasms do you prefer?
The non-existent cartoon Catholics portrayed in your comic strip, or the real-life Islamists portrayed in the link below?
Non-existent? Perhaps you would like to share with us the official position of the Catholic church regarding contraception while you try to remove your foot from your mouth.
[b]I'm aware of the official position of the Catholic church on contraception, and I've stated numerous times that I don't agree with it.
I am also aware that characters in a comic strip are non-existent people.
So, regarding my question:
Myself, I am very, very pro-female orgasm.
You, I'm not so sure.
But, just for the sake of argument, whose method of preventing female orgasms is preferable in the real world?
Catholic or Muslim?
I'll take door #1, Monty.
How about you?
I'll take doors number 1 & 2 since your Muslim argument is completely off topic as usual. The fact is that the Catholic church is against all forms of contraception,thus putting a damper on sex for pleasure and therefore female orgasms.
Back to top Go down
happy jack

avatar

Posts : 5986

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   2/28/2012, 9:44 am

Artie60438 wrote:
happy jack wrote:
Artie60438 wrote:
happy jack wrote:
Artie60438 wrote:


Whose method of preventing female orgasms do you prefer?
The non-existent cartoon Catholics portrayed in your comic strip, or the real-life Islamists portrayed in the link below?
Non-existent? Perhaps you would like to share with us the official position of the Catholic church regarding contraception while you try to remove your foot from your mouth.
[b]I'm aware of the official position of the Catholic church on contraception, and I've stated numerous times that I don't agree with it.
I am also aware that characters in a comic strip are non-existent people.
So, regarding my question:
Myself, I am very, very pro-female orgasm.
You, I'm not so sure.
But, just for the sake of argument, whose method of preventing female orgasms is preferable in the real world?
Catholic or Muslim?
I'll take door #1, Monty.
How about you?
I'll take doors number 1 & 2 since your Muslim argument is completely off topic as usual. The fact is that the Catholic church is against all forms of contraception,thus putting a damper on sex for pleasure and therefore female orgasms.

Considering that you introduced the subject of religion and female orgasms, I don’t believe that you are in any position to charge me with being off-topic.
So, you’ll take door #1 and door #2?
In the context of this discussion, I can only take that to mean that you advocate both of the aforementioned methods of preventing female orgasm.
Funny, I never had you pegged as a pro-clitoridectomy kind of fellow.
Go figure.
Back to top Go down
Artie60438

avatar

Posts : 9366

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   2/28/2012, 11:13 am

happy jack wrote:
Artie60438 wrote:

Considering that you introduced the subject of religion and female orgasms, I don’t believe that you are in any position to charge me with being off-topic.
Yoo hoo? Anybody home? The topic of the thread is "Republicans War on Women" and the cartoon is a parody of the extremes they are going to.
Quote :
So, you’ll take door #1 and door #2?
In the context of this discussion, I can only take that to mean that you advocate both of the aforementioned methods of preventing female orgasm.
Funny, I never had you pegged as a pro-clitoridectomy kind of fellow.
Go figure.
What I advocate and the cartoon satirizes, is that male virgins who go to work every day in a dress,AKA Catholic bishops, have no business laying down the rules regarding female sexual and reproductive issues.
Back to top Go down
happy jack

avatar

Posts : 5986

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   2/28/2012, 11:43 am

Artie60438 wrote:
happy jack wrote:
Artie60438 wrote:

Considering that you introduced the subject of religion and female orgasms, I don’t believe that you are in any position to charge me with being off-topic.
Yoo hoo? Anybody home? The topic of the thread is "Republicans War on Women" and the cartoon is a parody of the extremes they are going to.
Quote :
So, you’ll take door #1 and door #2?
In the context of this discussion, I can only take that to mean that you advocate both of the aforementioned methods of preventing female orgasm.
Funny, I never had you pegged as a pro-clitoridectomy kind of fellow.
Go figure.
What I advocate and the cartoon satirizes, is that male virgins who go to work every day in a dress,AKA Catholic bishops, have no business laying down the rules regarding female sexual and reproductive issues.

I see.
The topic of the thread is "Republicans War on Women", with a focus on domestic violence.
You posted a cartoon about female orgasms vis a vis the Catholic church.
Hence, I am off-topic.
Got it.


Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes
Back to top Go down
Artie60438

avatar

Posts : 9366

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   2/28/2012, 4:34 pm

happy jack wrote:
I see.
The topic of the thread is "Republicans War on Women", with a focus on domestic violence.
You posted a cartoon about female orgasms vis a vis the Catholic church.
Hence, I am off-topic.
Yep! 1) Been listening to Rick Santorum lately or the antics of lunatic Repukes that think their latest and greatest idea is to mandate vaginal probes?
2) You also tried to steer the subject to crazy Islamics in Yemen of all places. How on earth was that relevant,einstein?
Back to top Go down
happy jack

avatar

Posts : 5986

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   2/28/2012, 5:09 pm

Artie60438 wrote:
happy jack wrote:
I see.
The topic of the thread is "Republicans War on Women", with a focus on domestic violence.
You posted a cartoon about female orgasms vis a vis the Catholic church.
Hence, I am off-topic.
You also tried to steer the subject to crazy Islamics in Yemen of all places. How on earth was that relevant,einstein?
Sorry, Artie, but the subject had already been 'steered' toward religion and female orgasms by - wait for it - you!!!!
You really should try to stay on topic, you know.
Back to top Go down
Artie60438

avatar

Posts : 9366

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   2/28/2012, 7:05 pm

happy jack wrote:
Artie60438 wrote:
happy jack wrote:
I see.
The topic of the thread is "Republicans War on Women", with a focus on domestic violence.
You posted a cartoon about female orgasms vis a vis the Catholic church.
Hence, I am off-topic.
You also tried to steer the subject to crazy Islamics in Yemen of all places. How on earth was that relevant,einstein?
[b]Sorry, Artie, but the subject had already been 'steered' toward religion and female orgasms by - wait for it - you!!!!
You really should try to stay on topic, you know.
I should have known that the cartoon's message would go over your head. When you can put together a cogent argument wake me up. Sleep
Back to top Go down
happy jack

avatar

Posts : 5986

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   2/28/2012, 8:19 pm

Artie60438 wrote:
happy jack wrote:
Artie60438 wrote:
happy jack wrote:
I see.
The topic of the thread is "Republicans War on Women", with a focus on domestic violence.
You posted a cartoon about female orgasms vis a vis the Catholic church.
Hence, I am off-topic.
You also tried to steer the subject to crazy Islamics in Yemen of all places. How on earth was that relevant,einstein?
[b]Sorry, Artie, but the subject had already been 'steered' toward religion and female orgasms by - wait for it - you!!!!
You really should try to stay on topic, you know.
I should have known that the cartoon's message would go over your head. When you can put together a cogent argument wake me up. Sleep
What took you so long to play the trusty Boredom Card?
(Or, more accurately, the Tail Between Your Legs Card.)
Back to top Go down
Artie60438

avatar

Posts : 9366

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   2/29/2012, 8:49 am

happy jack wrote:
Artie60438 wrote:
happy jack wrote:
Artie60438 wrote:
happy jack wrote:
I see.
The topic of the thread is "Republicans War on Women", with a focus on domestic violence.
You posted a cartoon about female orgasms vis a vis the Catholic church.
Hence, I am off-topic.
You also tried to steer the subject to crazy Islamics in Yemen of all places. How on earth was that relevant,einstein?
[b]Sorry, Artie, but the subject had already been 'steered' toward religion and female orgasms by - wait for it - you!!!!
You really should try to stay on topic, you know.
I should have known that the cartoon's message would go over your head. When you can put together a cogent argument wake me up. Sleep
What took you so long to play the trusty Boredom Card?
(Or, more accurately, the Tail Between Your Legs Card.)
Note to self:Do not engage the troll.
Back to top Go down
happy jack

avatar

Posts : 5986

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   2/29/2012, 8:57 am

Artie60438 wrote:
happy jack wrote:
Artie60438 wrote:
happy jack wrote:
Artie60438 wrote:
happy jack wrote:
I see.
The topic of the thread is "Republicans War on Women", with a focus on domestic violence.
You posted a cartoon about female orgasms vis a vis the Catholic church.
Hence, I am off-topic.
You also tried to steer the subject to crazy Islamics in Yemen of all places. How on earth was that relevant,einstein?
[b]Sorry, Artie, but the subject had already been 'steered' toward religion and female orgasms by - wait for it - you!!!!
You really should try to stay on topic, you know.
I should have known that the cartoon's message would go over your head. When you can put together a cogent argument wake me up. Sleep
What took you so long to play the trusty Boredom Card?
(Or, more accurately, the Tail Between Your Legs Card.)
Note to self:Do not engage the troll.
My responding to your post is not 'trolling'.
Had you yourself not derailed the thread, this dialogue would be unnecessary.
Back to top Go down
Artie60438

avatar

Posts : 9366

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   3/1/2012, 4:43 pm

Rush Limbaugh: I'll Buy Georgetown Women 'As Much Aspirin To Put Between Their Knees As They Want'
Quote :
Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh drew sharp criticism from Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) and others on Wednesday when he called Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown University law student, a "slut" and a "prostitute" for publicly advocating that employers cover contraception in their health plans. But instead of apologizing for his offensive comments on his show Thursday, he geared up for round two.

Channeling Foster Friess, a main financial backer of former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) , Limbaugh said that he would "happily buy [Sandra Fluke] all the aspirin she wants" to put between her knees in lieu of contraception.

He then expanded his offer to the whole university:

"A Georgetown coed told Nancy Pelosi's hearing that the women in her law school program are having so much sex they're going broke, so you and I should have to pay for their birth control. So what would you call that? I called it what it is," he said. "So, I'm offering a compromise today: I will buy all of the women at Georgetown University as much aspirin to put between their knees as they want."

Quote :
Limbaugh concluded his sexist rant by insisting that if women want their contraception covered, they should post pornographic videos of themselves online. "So Miss Fluke and the rest of you feminazis, here's the deal," he said. "If we are going to pay for your contraceptives and thus pay for you to have sex, we want something. We want you to post the videos online so we can all watch."
Back to top Go down
WhitingLib

avatar

Posts : 871

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   3/1/2012, 5:39 pm

Artie60438 wrote:
Rush Limbaugh: I'll Buy Georgetown Women 'As Much Aspirin To Put Between Their Knees As They Want'
Quote :
Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh drew sharp criticism from Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) and others on Wednesday when he called Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown University law student, a "slut" and a "prostitute" for publicly advocating that employers cover contraception in their health plans. But instead of apologizing for his offensive comments on his show Thursday, he geared up for round two.

Channeling Foster Friess, a main financial backer of former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) , Limbaugh said that he would "happily buy [Sandra Fluke] all the aspirin she wants" to put between her knees in lieu of contraception.

He then expanded his offer to the whole university:

"A Georgetown coed told Nancy Pelosi's hearing that the women in her law school program are having so much sex they're going broke, so you and I should have to pay for their birth control. So what would you call that? I called it what it is," he said. "So, I'm offering a compromise today: I will buy all of the women at Georgetown University as much aspirin to put between their knees as they want."

Quote :
Limbaugh concluded his sexist rant by insisting that if women want their contraception covered, they should post pornographic videos of themselves online. "So Miss Fluke and the rest of you feminazis, here's the deal," he said. "If we are going to pay for your contraceptives and thus pay for you to have sex, we want something. We want you to post the videos online so we can all watch."



Sandra Fluke is going to be on the Ed Schultz show tonight.
I hope she lawyers up and sues the hell out of that fat bastard Limbaugh.
Back to top Go down
Artie60438

avatar

Posts : 9366

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   3/2/2012, 6:52 am

-I hope the Dems keep pushing this. So far I have yet to hear one elected Republican criticize Limbecile....
Democrats urge Boehner to "repudiate" comments by Limbaugh on contraception testimony
Quote :
A group of Democratic members of Congress are continuing the political war over contraception and the latest move puts House Speaker John Boehner on the spot. Seventy-five lawmakers are urging the speaker to "repudiate" comments made by conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh.

Boehner's spokesperson declined to comment on on the letter.
Back to top Go down
Scorpion

avatar

Posts : 1916

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   3/2/2012, 5:18 pm

Yeah. Well the House GOP leadership is "distancing" itself from Limbaugh's comments.

House GOP leaders distance themselves from Limbaugh 'slut' comments

Quote :
House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) took the rare step Friday of criticizing radio host Rush Limbaugh, who earlier in the week called a Georgetown University law student a “slut” and a “prostitute.”

The Speaker “obviously believes the use of those words was inappropriate, as is trying to raise money off the situation,” a Boehner spokesman said.

A spokesman for Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) said, "It's not language the majority leader would condone."

Rush is a real ass. I understand that most of his appeal is because of his outrageousness, but these comments are really over the top. That stuff about wanting to watch videos of women having sex
(as the price for providing contraception) is really sick.

IMHO, he really should make a public apology to this student and to all women.
Back to top Go down
sparks



Posts : 2186

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   3/2/2012, 5:36 pm

Scorpion wrote:
Yeah. Well the House GOP leadership is "distancing" itself from Limbaugh's comments.

House GOP leaders distance themselves from Limbaugh 'slut' comments

Quote :
House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) took the rare step Friday of criticizing radio host Rush Limbaugh, who earlier in the week called a Georgetown University law student a “slut” and a “prostitute.”

The Speaker “obviously believes the use of those words was inappropriate, as is trying to raise money off the situation,” a Boehner spokesman said.

A spokesman for Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) said, "It's not language the majority leader would condone."

Rush is a real ass. I understand that most of his appeal is because of his outrageousness, but these comments are really over the top. That stuff about wanting to watch videos of women having sex
(as the price for providing contraception) is really sick.

IMHO, he really should make a public apology to this student and to all women.
I don't think you'll hear any apology out of Rush. He has become rich and famous by by saying things that are hateful and angry. Look for his rating to go up because of his latest display of ignorance.
Back to top Go down
Artie60438

avatar

Posts : 9366

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   3/2/2012, 6:39 pm

Scorpion wrote:
Yeah. Well the House GOP leadership is "distancing" itself from Limbaugh's comments.

Quote :
House GOP leaders distance themselves from Limbaugh 'slut' comments

House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) took the rare step Friday of criticizing radio host Rush Limbaugh, who earlier in the week called a Georgetown University law student a “slut” and a “prostitute.”

The Speaker “obviously believes the use of those words was inappropriate, as is trying to raise money off the situation,” a Boehner spokesman said.

A spokesman for Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) said, "It's not language the majority leader would condone."
You may call it distancing,I call it tap dancing. If a Democrat said anything remotely close to what Limbaugh said they'd be screaming for an apology and introducing congressional resolutions condemning the statements .
Quote :
IMHO, he really should make a public apology to this student and to all women.
I wouldn't hold my breath. Today he was acting as if he were the victim. Rolling Eyes

Here's how ignorant he is. This is from today's show:
Quote :
On Friday, Limbaugh defended his previous comments about Fluke and complained that "not one person says that, 'Well, did you ever think about maybe backing off the amount of sex that you have?' "

Later, Limbaugh said that requiring insurance companies to cover contraception is "no different than if somebody knocked on my door that I don't know and said, 'You know what? I'm out of money. I can't afford birth-control pills, and I'm supposed to have sex with three guys tonight.' "
You can read the rest of his assinine comments @ http://mediamatters.org/blog/201203010012
Does he not even understand how female contraception works? Shocked It's not taken every single time you have sex, like Viagra, a drug that he's very familiar with
Back to top Go down
WhitingLib

avatar

Posts : 871

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   3/2/2012, 8:36 pm

Several sponsors have pulled out on him.
Hopefully more will follow.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   

Back to top Go down
 
Republicans War on Women
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 2 of 18Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 10 ... 18  Next

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Let Freedom Reign! :: Nation/Other :: Nation/World-
Jump to: