Let Freedom Reign!


 
HomeHome  PublicationsPublications  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log in  

Share | 
 

 POTUS Debate #2

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2
AuthorMessage
Heretic

avatar

Posts : 3095

PostSubject: Re: POTUS Debate #2   10/18/2012, 10:30 pm

happy jack wrote:
If by "confronting" he meant "lying about" ....



Riiiiiight...

Congratulations. You're now the Obama administration's version of a Twoofer.
Back to top Go down
Heretic

avatar

Posts : 3095

PostSubject: Re: POTUS Debate #2   10/20/2012, 8:45 am

Just in case anyone misses what Scorpion posted here:

Scorpion wrote:
Concrete proof that the Administration was telling the truth all along...

CIA documents supported Susan Rice’s description of Benghazi attacks

Quote :
The Romney campaign may have misfired with its suggestion that statements by President Obama and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice about the Benghazi attack last month weren’t supported by intelligence, according to documents provided by a senior U.S. intelligence official.

“Talking points” prepared by the CIA on Sept. 15, the same day that Rice taped three television appearances, support her description of the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Consulate as a reaction to Arab anger about an anti-Muslim video prepared in the United States. According to the CIA account, “The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the U.S. Consulate and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations.”

Quote :
Here’s how the senior official described the jumble of events in Benghazi that day: “The attackers were disorganized; some seemed more interested in looting. Some who claimed to have participated joined the attack as it began or after it was under way. There is no evidence of rehearsals, they never got into the safe room . . . never took any hostages, didn’t bring explosives to blow the safe room door, and didn’t use a car bomb to blow the gates.”

The Benghazi flap is the sort of situation that intelligence officers dread: when politicians are demanding hard “yes” or “no” answers but evidence is fragmentary and conflicting. The political debate has focused on whether the attack was spontaneous or planned, but the official said there’s evidence of both, and that different attackers may have had different motives. There’s no dispute, however, that it was “an act of terror,” as Obama described it the next day.

At least we'll be able to see just how tight happy's hat is.
Back to top Go down
 
POTUS Debate #2
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 2 of 2Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Let Freedom Reign! :: Nation/Other :: Nation/World-
Jump to: