| What took you so long? | |
|
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Artie60438
Posts : 9728
| Subject: Re: What took you so long? 4/3/2012, 11:59 am | |
| - happy jack wrote:
[b]I guess a weasel-like answer is better than no answer at all. That's rich coming from someone who can't even admit what presidential candidate they are supporting. | |
|
| |
happy jack
Posts : 6988
| Subject: Re: What took you so long? 4/3/2012, 12:14 pm | |
| - Artie60438 wrote:
- happy jack wrote:
[b]I guess a weasel-like answer is better than no answer at all. That's rich coming from someone who can't even admit what presidential candidate they are supporting. Romney. Your turn. | |
|
| |
Heretic
Posts : 3520
| Subject: Re: What took you so long? 4/3/2012, 1:05 pm | |
| - happy jack wrote:
- Heretic wrote:
- …. because the investigation was still a rather poor one ….
Then why are you citing the lead investigator as someone whose opinion should be respected? Because even what little they had was enough for him. The information coming out now with further investigation, the investigation that would not be happening sans the public outcry, hasn't been in Zimmerman's favor. | |
|
| |
Artie60438
Posts : 9728
| Subject: Re: What took you so long? 4/3/2012, 1:09 pm | |
| - happy jack wrote:
- Artie60438 wrote:
- happy jack wrote:
[b]I guess a weasel-like answer is better than no answer at all. That's rich coming from someone who can't even admit what presidential candidate they are supporting. Romney. Wow! Bold choice now that he's pretty much got it wrapped up. - Quote :
- Your turn.
Unfortunately I don't possess psychic powers. Like I said "Since I wasn't part of the production process I have no idea what NBC's intentions were". | |
|
| |
UrRight
Posts : 3993
| Subject: Re: What took you so long? 4/3/2012, 1:54 pm | |
| Do you think Obama is advised daily?
I mean, how much money do you think he has left in his private account?
Didn't think so.. Those are the "loopholes" he needs to tie up.
Non that will show him as the bread-winner.
Freaking Leeches. | |
|
| |
happy jack
Posts : 6988
| Subject: Re: What took you so long? 4/3/2012, 4:21 pm | |
| - Heretic wrote:
- happy jack wrote:
- Heretic wrote:
- …. because the investigation was still a rather poor one ….
Then why are you citing the lead investigator as someone whose opinion should be respected? Because even what little they had was enough for him. Do you prefer an investigator who makes knee-jerk snap judgments over one who investigates thoroughly? | |
|
| |
happy jack
Posts : 6988
| |
| |
Artie60438
Posts : 9728
| Subject: Re: What took you so long? 4/4/2012, 5:35 am | |
| - happy jack wrote:
- Artie60438 wrote:
- happy jack wrote:
- Artie60438 wrote:
- happy jack wrote:
[b]I guess a weasel-like answer is better than no answer at all. That's rich coming from someone who can't even admit what presidential candidate they are supporting. Romney. Wow! Bold choice now that he's pretty much got it wrapped up. - Quote :
- Artie60438 wrote:
-
It would be nice of you could stick to the topic which is .... ("What took you so long?") .... instead of trying to derail the thread with wingnut talking points Hey genius....Since the topic is "What took you so long?" it's more than appropriate to point out how long it took for you to figure out which candidate you would be told to support by the Republican establishment. | |
|
| |
happy jack
Posts : 6988
| Subject: Re: What took you so long? 4/4/2012, 10:25 am | |
| Hey, genius .... - Artie60438 wrote:
-
It would be nice of you could stick to the topic | |
|
| |
Artie60438
Posts : 9728
| Subject: Re: What took you so long? 4/4/2012, 10:57 am | |
| - happy jack wrote:
- Hey, genius ....
- Artie60438 wrote:
-
It would be nice of you could stick to the topic The topic is "What took you so long". Therefore,what took you so long to finally confess that you're supporting Romney is directly on topic Myself and others were asking you for almost a year now. So what took you so long | |
|
| |
happy jack
Posts : 6988
| |
| |
Artie60438
Posts : 9728
| |
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: What took you so long? | |
| |
|
| |
| What took you so long? | |
|