Let Freedom Reign!


 
HomeHome  PublicationsPublications  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log in  

Share | 
 

 Republicans War on Women

Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1 ... 15 ... 25, 26, 27
AuthorMessage
happy jack

avatar

Posts : 6544

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   10/12/2018, 8:54 am

Scorpion wrote:
 Based on what, exactly?  An Anonymous tip?  

Based on Ford's letter to Feinstein.
What the hell have we been talking about?



Scorpion wrote:
Who would order the FBI to open such an investigation?

Presumably, the same entity that opened the previous 7 billion investigations into Kavanaugh's background.
Back to top Go down
happy jack

avatar

Posts : 6544

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   10/12/2018, 9:00 am

Heretic wrote:
.... lower standards, apply here.

Those on the Left have most certainly applied the lowest standards imaginable - to themselves - in this huge joke of a process.
Back to top Go down
happy jack

avatar

Posts : 6544

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   10/12/2018, 9:13 am

Heretic wrote:
 
Quote :
FBI Director Christopher Wray told the Senate on Wednesday that the White House put limits on the re-opened investigation into Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, but the law enforcement chief insisted that the process used was a typical one.


Actual adults had to step in at some point. If they hadn't, the Lefties would still be running around in circles waving the 'Oh, yeah!?!? But what about boofing!?!?' flag.
Back to top Go down
Heretic

avatar

Posts : 3236

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   10/12/2018, 9:30 am

I wrote:
I wrote:
I'm fine with just one "free reign" investigation Trump promised us.

Just to be clear, is that what you're saying this investigation was?

happy jack wrote:
Actual adults had to step in at some point.

I guess that's a yes, then. Laughing
Back to top Go down
happy jack

avatar

Posts : 6544

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   10/12/2018, 11:01 am

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/feinstein-releases-cryptic-statement-about-brett-kavanaugh-nomination-amid-intrigue-over-secret-letter

According to a report by The Intercept, the letter was relayed to lawmakers by an individual affiliated with Stanford University and concerns an incident involving the 53-year-old Kavanaugh and a woman while they were in high school. According to two officials who spoke anonymously with the New York Times, the incident involved possible sexual misconduct between Kavanaugh and the woman.
The letter reportedly was given to Feinstein by Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., but has not been publicly disclosed by senators who have seen the document. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said that the letter in question has been referred to the FBI for investigation.
Two sources familiar with the matter tell Fox News that Feinstein has had possession of the letter regarding Kavanaugh since July. Feinstein met privately with Kavanaugh on August 20 and also questioned him repeatedly in open and closed session during the Judiciary Committee hearings on his nomination last week. There is no indication that the matter came up in either the private meeting or the closed committee session.
The FBI conducts background checks on all major government appointees, including Supreme Court nominees.
“Upon receipt of the information on the night of September 12, we included it as part of Judge Kavanaugh’s background file, as per the standard process,” the FBI said in a statement. Fox News has learned that the White House would have to request that the bureau follow up on the letter for the matter to be investigated further. It was not clear whether the White House had done so as of Thursday evening.
The woman referenced in the letter has yet to be identified, but is being represented by Debra Katz, a whistleblower attorney who works with #MeToo survivors, according to The Intercept.




For the sake of clarity, let us get something straight.
As of September 13th, the woman had yet to be identified, but Dick Durbin claimed, 'the letter in question has been referred to the FBI for investigation.'
Pay close attention, because there is a big question here: Why was it acceptable to refer the letter to the FBI on
or around September 13th, while the woman was still unidentified, yet it was wrong to refer the letter to the FBI on July 30th, while the woman was still unidentified?
Timing, anyone?
Back to top Go down
Heretic

avatar

Posts : 3236

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   10/12/2018, 2:28 pm

Already answered.

Like half a dozen times already. Jesus fuck, you're lazy...
Back to top Go down
Heretic

avatar

Posts : 3236

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   10/12/2018, 2:51 pm

So, here's a question. You've certainly gone to bat for him like he's the Second Coming, martyr and all. Are you happy this guy was confirmed? Why him over literally anyone else?
Back to top Go down
happy jack

avatar

Posts : 6544

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   10/12/2018, 6:53 pm

Heretic wrote:
Already answered.

Like half a dozen times already. Jesus fuck, you're lazy...

If you can show precisely where in the testimony this question was satisfactorily answered (and no, merely providing a link for the whole goddam transcript does not count), I will have no problem admitting that I am wrong.

happy jack wrote:
For the sake of clarity, let us get something straight.
As of September 13th, the woman had yet to be identified, but Dick Durbin claimed, 'the letter in question has been referred to the FBI for investigation.'
Pay close attention, because there is a big question here: Why was it acceptable to refer the letter to the FBI on
or around September 13th, while the woman was still unidentified, yet it was wrong to refer the letter to the FBI on July 30th, while the woman was still unidentified?
Timing, anyone?
Back to top Go down
happy jack

avatar

Posts : 6544

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   10/12/2018, 7:02 pm

Heretic wrote:
So, here's a question. You've certainly gone to bat for him like he's the Second Coming, martyr and all. Are you happy this guy was confirmed?  Why him over literally anyone else?

I didn't go to bat specifically for Kavanaugh. In fact, I had never even heard of the guy until he was nominated. But it didn't matter if the nominee was Kavanaugh, or if the nominee was Gandhi Jesus Mother Teresa Buddha. The Left was undoubtedly going to react to and treat any nominee the same way - childishly and atrociously, as has been clearly demonstrated.
Tell me - which of any other of Trump's possible nominees would you have found acceptable?
Back to top Go down
Heretic

avatar

Posts : 3236

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   10/12/2018, 7:09 pm

happy jack wrote:

via GIPHY

Back to top Go down
Heretic

avatar

Posts : 3236

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   10/12/2018, 7:15 pm

Quote :
The Left was undoubtedly going to react to and treat any nominee the same way...

'Cept we didn't with Gorsuch. So you're either too high or too stupid to continue this conversation.
Back to top Go down
happy jack

avatar

Posts : 6544

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   10/12/2018, 7:29 pm

Heretic wrote:
happy jack wrote:

via GIPHY


OK, so you have no answer.
Why not just say so straight out?
It would certainly be much less time-consuming than searching the Web for cartoons.
Back to top Go down
happy jack

avatar

Posts : 6544

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   10/12/2018, 7:37 pm

Heretic wrote:
Quote :
The Left was undoubtedly going to react to and treat any nominee the same way...

'Cept we didn't with Gorsuch.  So you're either too high or too stupid to continue this conversation.

Gorsuch replaced Scalia - there was little appreciable change to the ideological composition of the court, so the overall stakes were negligible. Those on the Left didn't want to tip their hand prematurely - they had to stockpile and conserve all their crazy until the time came for a nominee of consequence.
Hence the lunatic reaction to Kavanaugh.
All cleared up?
Back to top Go down
Scorpion

avatar

Posts : 2017

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   10/12/2018, 7:55 pm

Heretic wrote:
happy jack wrote:

via GIPHY


That is fucking awesome!
Back to top Go down
Scorpion

avatar

Posts : 2017

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   10/12/2018, 7:59 pm

This is worth watching...

Back to top Go down
happy jack

avatar

Posts : 6544

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   10/12/2018, 8:06 pm

Scorpion wrote:
Heretic wrote:
happy jack wrote:

via GIPHY


That is fucking awesome!

Man!
That is fucking awesome!
It is almost as fucking awesome as the answer Heretic gave when I axed him this:


happy jack wrote:
If you can show precisely where in the testimony this question was satisfactorily answered (and no, merely providing a link for the whole goddam transcript does not count), I will have no problem admitting that I am wrong.

happy jack wrote:
For the sake of clarity, let us get something straight.
As of September 13th, the woman had yet to be identified, but Dick Durbin claimed, 'the letter in question has been referred to the FBI for investigation.'
Pay close attention, because there is a big question here: Why was it acceptable to refer the letter to the FBI on
or around September 13th, while the woman was still unidentified, yet it was wrong to refer the letter to the FBI on July 30th, while the woman was still unidentified?
Timing, anyone?

Oh .... wait .... never mind.
Back to top Go down
Heretic

avatar

Posts : 3236

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   10/13/2018, 11:24 am

happy jack wrote:
Gorsuch replaced Scalia - there was little appreciable change to the ideological composition of the court, so the overall stakes were negligible.

He also wasn't a demonstrable liar and accused of rape.

Small but important differences.

happy jack wrote:
Tell me - which of any other of Trump's possible nominees would you have found acceptable?

Anyone that wasn't a liar or prone to batshit, partisan conspiracy theories like Kavanaugh.  I'd disagree with them along ideological lines, most likely, but I wouldn't be as worried about them as I am Kavanaugh.
Back to top Go down
happy jack

avatar

Posts : 6544

PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   10/14/2018, 3:04 pm

Heretic wrote:
 
happy jack wrote:
Tell me - which of any other of Trump's possible nominees would you have found acceptable?

Anyone that wasn't a liar or prone to batshit, partisan conspiracy theories like Kavanaugh.  I'd disagree with them along ideological lines, most likely, but I wouldn't be as worried about them as I am Kavanaugh.

OK. Thanks.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Republicans War on Women   

Back to top Go down
 
Republicans War on Women
Back to top 
Page 27 of 27Go to page : Previous  1 ... 15 ... 25, 26, 27

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Let Freedom Reign! :: Nation/Other :: Nation/World-
Jump to: